not enough blocks for JFFS?

[Tim Wu]

So, by this approach, all the data-save write operations must be done 
through this
user-space lib instead of standard UNIX file I/O, right?


Russ Dill :

>Your goals would be better served by a user-space solution from what I
>can tell. Not only would there be less code, but that code would be
>compressed in cramfs. I'm able to use 1 boot block for blob, another for
>static configuration, and the remaining two for configuration data saved
>in this way.
>
>  
>