issue with eraseall
Thomas Gleixner
tglx at linutronix.de
Wed Apr 2 12:15:56 EST 2003
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 17:55, Earl Manning wrote:
> In my implementation I just changed the value written by eraseall to be 8.
> The offending pieces of code are:
>
> util/eraseall.c:84
> fs/jffs2/wbuf.c:671-675
I don't see a piece of offending code there
util/eraseall.c: 106 ...
// format for JFFS2
if (!jffs2)
continue;
// write cleanmarker
---> if (isNAND) {
struct mtd_oob_buf oob;
oob.ptr = (unsigned char *) &cleanmarker;
oob.start = erase.start;
---> oob.start += meminfo.oobsize == 16 ? 8 : 6;
---> oob.length = meminfo.oobsize == 16 ? 8 : 2;
if (ioctl (fd, MEMWRITEOOB, &oob) != 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "\n%s: %s: MTD writeoob failure: %s\n", exe_name,
mtd_device, strerror(errno));
continue;
}
} else {
This is for NOR !
}
--
Thomas
________________________________________________________________________
linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux
http://www.linutronix.de
mail: tglx at linutronix.de
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list