joakim.tjernlund at lumentis.se said: > >>???; c007fbc8 <jffs2_do_unlink+2e0/338> <===== > Trace; c007fb0c <jffs2_do_unlink+224/338> Now fixed, I think. > But why can't JFFS2 resolve this itself? Should it not just "delete" > the bad nodes? Possibly, yes. -- dwmw2