Reproduction of NFTL Bug with DOC 2000 288MB FULL DEBUG

[Brian P. Austin]

OK.

re-did everything from scratch.  Dformat doc42.exb and loaded modules

modprobe -a doc2000 nftl mtdchar mtdcore
modprobe -a docprobe

the end of the output is.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait

-- A whole lot of this --

_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
 nftla:<6>NFTL_request
NFTL Read  request, from sector 0x0000 for 0x0002 sectors
Waiting for mutex
Got mutex
NFTL read request of 0x2 sectors @ 0 (req->nr_sectors == 8)
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
NFTL read request completed OK
end_request(1)
NFTL_request
NFTL Read  request, from sector 0x0002 for 0x0002 sectors
Waiting for mutex
Got mutex
NFTL read request of 0x2 sectors @ 2 (req->nr_sectors == 6)
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
NFTL read request completed OK
end_request(1)
NFTL_request
NFTL Read  request, from sector 0x0004 for 0x0002 sectors
Waiting for mutex
Got mutex
NFTL read request of 0x2 sectors @ 4 (req->nr_sectors == 4)
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
NFTL read request completed OK
end_request(1)
NFTL_request
NFTL Read  request, from sector 0x0006 for 0x0002 sectors
Waiting for mutex
Got mutex
NFTL read request of 0x2 sectors @ 6 (req->nr_sectors == 2)
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
_DoC_WaitReady called for out-of-line wait
NFTL read request completed OK
end_request(1)
 nftla1

.

Is this correct?

Brian Austin