From 2.4.9 to CVS ???

[Patrick Allaire]

I really dont understand ... I have a sh link in /bin ... but it is not
found by the kernel ... and my cramfs didnt changed a bit !!! 

in /bin, I have a link : sh -> busybox

Patrick Allaire
mailto:pallaire at gameloft.com
If you can see it, but it's not there, it's virtual. 
If you can't see it, but it is there, it's hidden. 
It you can't see it and it isn't there, it's gone.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2 at infradead.org]
> Sent: January 4, 2002 11:54 AM
> To: Patrick Allaire
> Cc: Björn Eriksson; linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: From 2.4.9 to CVS ??? 
> 
> 
> 
> pallaire at gameloft.com said:
> >  No I dont have 'bad cramfs magic' !!! I tought it could be the case
> > ... but I looked at the mkcramfs.c from the 2.4.9 and 2.4.17 version
> > and there is no difference So the generated code should be 
> the same. 
> 
> P'raps we started paying attention to execute bits on 
> libraries between 
> 2.4.9 and 2.4.17? I thought we did that a long time ago though. 
> 
> Put a statically linked shell in the cramfs and boot with 
> that as init. 
> Then try running /sbin/init and see what errors you get.
> 
> 
> --
> dwmw2
> 
>