sszie_t and loff_t V.S u_int32_t (Was Re: Problems with nftl_format)

[Ollie Lho]

David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> pollastri at iriti.cnr.it said:
> > MEMWRITEOOB at 14200: Invalid argument
> 
> OK, I probably broke it when I changed the structures slightly to make
> sparc64 happy. Can you confirm or deny my suspicion that it broke on the
> 17th of March?
> 
> Does it start to work again if you recompile nftl_format against the new
> headers?
> 

David,
	I think the problem should be that you have changed the definition
of struct mtd_oob_buf. In older header file you have:

struct mtd_oob_buf {
        loff_t start;
        ssize_t length;  
        unsigned char *ptr;
};

and in newer header file:

struct mtd_oob_buf {
        loff_t start;
        ssize_t length;  
        unsigned char *ptr;
};

But you still use loff_t and ssize_t in mtd_ioctl in mtdchar.c

		ret = (mtd->write_oob)(mtd, buf.start, buf.length, &retlen, 			
databuf);

		if (copy_to_user((void *)arg + sizeof(loff_t), &retlen, 			
sizeof(ssize_t)))
			ret = -EFAULT;

Dose this cause any problem ??

Ollie


To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org