David Given dg at
Thu Sep 14 06:03:26 EDT 2000

>Doesn't look like it'll work on 2.2 without devfs. I've littered it with 
>appropriate (but ugly) ifdefs. We should probably put the devfs stuff into 

Not sure this is a good idea; the actual logic is different, it's not just a 
matter of changing some of the function names.

>I'd go for /dev/mtdblock/%d

Is it wise to use different top-level directory names?

>It'd be nice if we could get it to create the device nodes only when 
>devices are present.

Done. (I've also integrated the devfs changes.) I'm not sure that this is the 
right way to test to see if a device exists, though.

David Given
dg at

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1310 bytes
Desc: patch
Url : 

More information about the linux-mtd mailing list