Flash chip locking

[Alice Hennessy]

David Woodhouse wrote:

> Unfortunately, we have to consider the fact that this lock will also be
> obtained from a Bottom Half context, when the "has the erase finished yet?"
> timer runs. Therefore, all occurrences of spin_lock in the main code have
> to be spin_lock_bh()¹ instead of the nurmal (and almost free) spin_lock().
>
>

Was the  "has the erase finished yet?" timer the only reason for using
spin_lock_bh instead of spin_lock?   Since the timer isn't implemented yet,
spin_lock can be used at the moment, correct?   I'm experimenting with the
driver in an environment that can  only tolerate disabling the bottom half for
very brief periods.

Alice



To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org