MTD on intel 28F320B3 flash memory

[David Woodhouse]

nico at cam.org said:
>  But then you have problem with concurent access to the chip... unless
> the code is tweaked so both mtd devices share the same spinlock and
> wq. 

Yep. That's not difficult. Actually, I think that's why the struct flchip 
contains both a spin_lock_t *mutex and the spinlock itself - so that you 
can point to a spinlock elsewhere if you want to.

--
dwmw2




To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org