Flash chip locking
kira at linuxgrrls.org
Wed Jun 28 07:16:35 EDT 2000
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Brendan Simon wrote:
> You are implying that 128us is a large amount of time to wait. Maybe
> with todays processors it is, I don't really know if it is or isn't for
> the average processor speed.
On a 1GHz processor, sometimes we can do more than one instruction every
1nsec. 128usecs is an eternity. (128usecs was long enough to do a
complete DRAM refresh on a 1MHz 6502...)
> Does the udelay() imply that the scheduler can switch to another process ?
Specifically it's there so that interrupts can happen so that bottom ends
can run; scheduling isn't an issue.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org
More information about the linux-mtd