mtd: nand: allocate aligned buffers if NAND_OWN_BUFFERS is unset

[Linux-MTD Mailing List]

Gitweb:     http://git.infradead.org/?p=mtd-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3deb9979c7319bc7846d1aac528a9db85162960a
Commit:     3deb9979c7319bc7846d1aac528a9db85162960a
Parent:     e7beeeec854c40c28caa53bd84fdf26e9e459f06
Author:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Mar 30 17:15:04 2017 +0900
Committer:  Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
CommitDate: Tue Apr 25 14:18:37 2017 +0200

    mtd: nand: allocate aligned buffers if NAND_OWN_BUFFERS is unset
    
    Some NAND controllers are using DMA engine requiring a specific
    buffer alignment.  The core provides no guarantee on the nand_buffers
    pointers, which forces some drivers to allocate their own buffers
    and pass the NAND_OWN_BUFFERS flag.
    
    Rework the nand_buffers allocation logic to allocate each buffer
    independently.  This should make most NAND controllers/DMA engine
    happy, and allow us to get rid of these custom buf allocation in
    NAND controller drivers.
    
    Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
    Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index de6c804..c796d0e 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -4495,7 +4495,7 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 {
 	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
 	struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
-	struct nand_buffers *nbuf;
+	struct nand_buffers *nbuf = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* New bad blocks should be marked in OOB, flash-based BBT, or both */
@@ -4509,13 +4509,28 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	}
 
 	if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
-		nbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*nbuf) + mtd->writesize
-				+ mtd->oobsize * 3, GFP_KERNEL);
+		nbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*nbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!nbuf)
 			return -ENOMEM;
-		nbuf->ecccalc = (uint8_t *)(nbuf + 1);
-		nbuf->ecccode = nbuf->ecccalc + mtd->oobsize;
-		nbuf->databuf = nbuf->ecccode + mtd->oobsize;
+
+		nbuf->ecccalc = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!nbuf->ecccalc) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto err_free;
+		}
+
+		nbuf->ecccode = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!nbuf->ecccode) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto err_free;
+		}
+
+		nbuf->databuf = kmalloc(mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize,
+					GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!nbuf->databuf) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto err_free;
+		}
 
 		chip->buffers = nbuf;
 	} else {
@@ -4755,8 +4770,12 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	/* Build bad block table */
 	return chip->scan_bbt(mtd);
 err_free:
-	if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS))
-		kfree(chip->buffers);
+	if (nbuf) {
+		kfree(nbuf->databuf);
+		kfree(nbuf->ecccode);
+		kfree(nbuf->ecccalc);
+		kfree(nbuf);
+	}
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail);
@@ -4807,8 +4826,12 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
 
 	/* Free bad block table memory */
 	kfree(chip->bbt);
-	if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS))
+	if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) && chip->buffers) {
+		kfree(chip->buffers->databuf);
+		kfree(chip->buffers->ecccode);
+		kfree(chip->buffers->ecccalc);
 		kfree(chip->buffers);
+	}
 
 	/* Free bad block descriptor memory */
 	if (chip->badblock_pattern && chip->badblock_pattern->options