[net-next PATCH v4 11/11] net: airoha: add phylink support for GDM2/3/4

Lorenzo Bianconi lorenzo at kernel.org
Mon May 12 05:53:18 PDT 2025


[...]
> > 
> > I guess you can use devm_kcalloc() and get rid of kfree() here.
> >
> 
> I forgot to answer to this in the previous revision. No devm can't be
> used there available_pcs is just an array allocated for phylink_config.
> 
> Phylink then copy the data in it and doesn't use it anymore hence it
> just needs to be allocated here and doesn't need to stay till the driver
> gets removed.

I guess this is exactly the point. Since available_pcs is used just here and
this is not a hot-path, I think the code would be simpler, but I do not have
a strong opinion about it.

> 
> > > +	if (!available_pcs)
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +	err = fwnode_phylink_pcs_parse(dev_fwnode(&dev->dev), available_pcs,
> > > +				       &num_pcs);
> > > +	if (err)
> > > +		goto out;
> > > +
> > > +	port->phylink_config.available_pcs = available_pcs;
> > > +	port->phylink_config.num_available_pcs = num_pcs;
> > > +
> > > +	__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII,
> > > +		  port->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
> > > +	__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX,
> > > +		  port->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
> > > +	__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX,
> > > +		  port->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
> > > +	__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII,
> > > +		  port->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
> > > +
> > > +	phy_interface_copy(port->phylink_config.pcs_interfaces,
> > > +			   port->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
> > > +
> > > +	phylink = phylink_create(&port->phylink_config,
> > > +				 of_fwnode_handle(np),
> > > +				 phy_mode, &airoha_phylink_ops);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(phylink)) {
> > > +		err = PTR_ERR(phylink);
> > > +		goto out;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	port->phylink = phylink;
> > > +out:
> > > +	kfree(available_pcs);
> > > +
> > > +	return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int airoha_alloc_gdm_port(struct airoha_eth *eth,
> > >  				 struct device_node *np, int index)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -2873,7 +3004,23 @@ static int airoha_alloc_gdm_port(struct airoha_eth *eth,
> > >  	if (err)
> > >  		return err;
> > >  
> > > -	return register_netdev(dev);
> > > +	if (airhoa_is_phy_external(port)) {
> > > +		err = airoha_setup_phylink(dev);
> > 
> > This will re-introduce the issue reported here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/5c94b9b3850f7f29ed653e2205325620df28c3ff.1746715755.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> > 
> 
> I'm confused about this. The suggestion wasn't that register_netdev
> might fail and I need to destroy phylink? Or the linked patch was merged
> and I need to rebase on top of net-next?

what I mean here is if register_netdev() or airoha_setup_phylink() fails, we
should free metadata_dst running airoha_metadata_dst_free() as pointed out by
Christophe. I think this path depends on Christophe's one.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> I didn't include that change to not cause conflicts but once it's merged
> I will rebase and include that fix.
> 
> > > +		if (err)
> > > +			return err;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	err = register_netdev(dev);
> > > +	if (err)
> > > +		goto free_phylink;
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +
> > > +free_phylink:
> > > +	if (airhoa_is_phy_external(port))
> > > +		phylink_destroy(port->phylink);
> > > +
> > > +	return err;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static int airoha_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > @@ -2967,6 +3114,9 @@ static int airoha_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  		struct airoha_gdm_port *port = eth->ports[i];
> > >  
> > >  		if (port && port->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED) {
> > > +			if (airhoa_is_phy_external(port))
> > > +				phylink_destroy(port->phylink);
> > > +
> > >  			unregister_netdev(port->dev);
> > >  			airoha_metadata_dst_free(port);
> > >  		}
> > > @@ -2994,6 +3144,9 @@ static void airoha_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  			continue;
> > >  
> > >  		airoha_dev_stop(port->dev);
> > > +		if (airhoa_is_phy_external(port))
> > > +			phylink_destroy(port->phylink);
> > > +
> > >  		unregister_netdev(port->dev);
> > >  		airoha_metadata_dst_free(port);
> > >  	}
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> > > index 53f39083a8b0..73a500474076 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> > > @@ -498,6 +498,9 @@ struct airoha_gdm_port {
> > >  	struct net_device *dev;
> > >  	int id;
> > >  
> > > +	struct phylink *phylink;
> > > +	struct phylink_config phylink_config;
> > > +
> > >  	struct airoha_hw_stats stats;
> > >  
> > >  	DECLARE_BITMAP(qos_sq_bmap, AIROHA_NUM_QOS_CHANNELS);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_regs.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_regs.h
> > > index d931530fc96f..54f7079b28b0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_regs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_regs.h
> > > @@ -357,6 +357,18 @@
> > >  #define IP_FRAGMENT_PORT_MASK		GENMASK(8, 5)
> > >  #define IP_FRAGMENT_NBQ_MASK		GENMASK(4, 0)
> > >  
> > > +#define REG_GDMA4_TMBI_FRAG		0x2028
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII1_TX_WEIGHT_MASK	GENMASK(31, 26)
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII1_TX_FRAG_SIZE_MASK	GENMASK(25, 16)
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII0_TX_WEIGHT_MASK	GENMASK(15, 10)
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII0_TX_FRAG_SIZE_MASK	GENMASK(9, 0)
> > > +
> > > +#define REG_GDMA4_RMBI_FRAG		0x202c
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII1_RX_WEIGHT_MASK	GENMASK(31, 26)
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII1_RX_FRAG_SIZE_MASK	GENMASK(25, 16)
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII0_RX_WEIGHT_MASK	GENMASK(15, 10)
> > > +#define GDMA4_SGMII0_RX_FRAG_SIZE_MASK	GENMASK(9, 0)
> > > +
> > >  #define REG_MC_VLAN_EN			0x2100
> > >  #define MC_VLAN_EN_MASK			BIT(0)
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.48.1
> > > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 	Ansuel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/attachments/20250512/32340aa7/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Linux-mediatek mailing list