[PATCH v2 2/4] net: airoha: Fix an error handling path in airoha_probe()

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 08/05/2025 à 17:10, Lorenzo Bianconi a écrit :
>> If an error occurs after a successful airoha_hw_init() call,
>> airoha_ppe_deinit() needs to be called as already done in the remove
>> function.
>>
>> Fixes: 00a7678310fe ("net: airoha: Introduce flowtable offload support")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>>    - Call airoha_ppe_init() at the right place in the error handling path
>>      of the probe   [Lorenzo Bianconi]
>>
>> Compile tested only.
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
>> index af8c4015938c..d435179875df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
>> @@ -2967,6 +2967,7 @@ static int airoha_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   error_napi_stop:
>>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(eth->qdma); i++)
>>   		airoha_qdma_stop_napi(&eth->qdma[i]);
>> +	airoha_ppe_init(eth);
> it was actually a typo in my previous email but this should be clearly
> airoha_ppe_deinit().

My bad!
Sorry for not spotting myself it.

We can really trust no one, nowadays ! :)

The good news is that my cocci script would have spotted it the next 
time I would have run it, because it would still find a 
airoha_ppe_deinit() in the remove function, but none in the probe.

I give you some time to review the other patches, and I'll a v3 later.

CJ

>
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
>
>>   error_hw_cleanup:
>>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(eth->qdma); i++)
>>   		airoha_hw_cleanup(&eth->qdma[i]);
>> -- 
>> 2.49.0
>>