[bug report] pinctrl: mediatek: Add EINT support for multiple addresses
Dan Carpenter
dan.carpenter at linaro.org
Mon Mar 24 22:45:13 PDT 2025
Hello Hao Chang,
Commit 3ef9f710efcb ("pinctrl: mediatek: Add EINT support for
multiple addresses") from Mar 22, 2025 (linux-next), leads to the
following Smatch static checker warning:
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c:384 mtk_build_eint()
warn: error code type promoted to positive: 'count_reg_names'
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
374 return 0;
375
376 if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "interrupt-controller"))
377 return -ENODEV;
378
379 hw->eint = devm_kzalloc(hw->dev, sizeof(*hw->eint), GFP_KERNEL);
380 if (!hw->eint)
381 return -ENOMEM;
382
383 count_reg_names = of_property_count_strings(np, "reg-names");
--> 384 if (count_reg_names < hw->soc->nbase_names)
count_reg_names is type int but hw->soc->nbase_names is unsigned int. So
if of_property_count_strings() returns a negative error code then it's
type promoted as a high positive unsigned int value and treated as success.
385 return -EINVAL;
386
387 hw->eint->nbase = count_reg_names - hw->soc->nbase_names;
hw->eint->nbase is a u8 so the negative value is truncated to a low positive
value.
388 hw->eint->base = devm_kmalloc_array(&pdev->dev, hw->eint->nbase,
389 sizeof(*hw->eint->base), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
This allocation will always succeed.
regards,
dan carpenter
390 if (!hw->eint->base) {
391 ret = -ENOMEM;
392 goto err_free_base;
393 }
394
395 for (i = hw->soc->nbase_names, j = 0; i < count_reg_names; i++, j++) {
396 hw->eint->base[j] = of_iomap(np, i);
397 if (IS_ERR(hw->eint->base[j])) {
398 ret = PTR_ERR(hw->eint->base[j]);
399 goto err_free_eint;
400 }
401 }
402
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list