[PATCHv4 wireless-next 7/7] dt-bindings: net: wireless: rt2800: add

[Rosen Penev]

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:27 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 02:04:48PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > Add device-tree bindings for the RT2800 SOC wifi device found in older
> > Ralink/Mediatek devices.
>
> Your subject was cut. Probably you wanted something like add "Realtek foo adapter" etc.
Not sure I follow.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml  | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a92aedf6ba01
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Ralink RT2880 wireless device
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl at wp.pl>
> > +
> > +description: |
> > +  This node provides properties for configuring RT2880 SOC wifi devices.
> > +  The node is expected to be specified as a root node of the device.
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: ieee80211.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - ralink,rt2880-wifi
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  interrupts:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
>
> Why clocks are optional? SoC devices rarely work without a clock.
Before this patchset the code was doing

 25         rt2x00dev->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 24         if (IS_ERR(rt2x00dev->clk))
 23                 rt2x00dev->clk = NULL;

I changed it to use devm_clk_get_optional since that's what it looks
like here. It's not returning under failure so I assume that means
it's optional.

OTOH all downstream OpenWrt users of this code (as well as
mt7620a.dtsi here) do specify a clock. _optional might be a mistake.

Maybe Stanislaw knows more.
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>