[PATCH v3 5/5] pci: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device
Nicolin Chen
nicolinc at nvidia.com
Thu Aug 21 23:35:27 PDT 2025
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:07:41AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:59:07PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > c) multiple pci_devs with their own RIDs
> >
> > In this case, either FLR or IOMMU only resets the PF. That
> > being said, VFs might be affected since PF is resetting?
> > If there is an issue, I don't see it coming from the IOMMU-
> > level reset..
>
> It would still allow the ATS issue from the VF side. The VF could be
> pushing an invalidation during the PF reset that will get clobbered.
>
> I haven't fully checked but I think Linux doesn't really (easially?)
> allow resetting a PF while a VF is present...
Hmm, what if the PF encountered some fault? Does Linux have a choice
not to reset PF?
> Arguably if the PF is reset the VFs should have their translations
> blocked too.
Yea, that sounds plausible to me. But, prior to that (an IOMMU-level
reset), should VFs be first reset at the PCI level?
Thanks
Nicolin
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list