[PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: mt6397: Add new bit definitions for RTC_BBPU register

[Shunxi Zhang (章顺喜)]

On Mon, 2025-08-11 at 13:02 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> On 11/08/2025 10:15, ot_shunxi.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Shunxi Zhang <ot_shunxi.zhang at mediatek.com>
> > 
> > This patch adds new bit definitions for the RTC_BBPU register in
> > the
> 
> Why? There is no user of these. Don't add useless defines.
> 
> > mt6397 RTC header file. The following bit definitions are
> > introduced:
> 
> Hm?
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shunxi Zhang <ot_shunxi.zhang at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > index 27883af44f87..001cef6b7302 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > @@ -15,8 +15,11 @@
> >  #include <linux/rtc.h>
> > 
> >  #define RTC_BBPU               0x0000
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_PWREN         BIT(0)
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_CLR           BIT(1)
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_RESET_AL      BIT(3)
> >  #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY         BIT(6)
> > -#define RTC_BBPU_KEY            (0x43 << 8)
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_KEY           (0x43 << 8)
> 
> 
> Why?
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Dear sir,
The MT6397 is an integration of several ICs and does not have a
separate IC specification. I will check the relevant IC datasheets
again. I will remove the useless define in next version.

Thanks for your commnets.

Best regards
Shunxi Zhangus