[PATCH v6 11/12] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober
Chen-Yu Tsai
wenst at chromium.org
Wed Sep 4 20:52:32 PDT 2024
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 6:08 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:00:13PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_of_hw_prober.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_of_hw_prober.c
> [...]
> > +static int chromeos_of_hw_prober_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hw_prober_platforms); i++) {
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!of_machine_is_compatible(hw_prober_platforms[i].compatible))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + ret = hw_prober_platforms[i].prober(&pdev->dev, hw_prober_platforms[i].data);
> > + /* Ignore unrecoverable errors and keep going through other probers */
> > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + return ret;
>
> Is it harmless if some of the components get probed multiple times? E.g.:
> comp1 probed -> comp2 probed -> comp3 returned -EPROBE_DEFER -> some time
> later, chromeos_of_hw_prober_probe() gets called again.
Yes it is harmless. Components already enabled will not get disabled
in the error path. And the prober that enabled that component will see
that a component was enabled, and skip doing the whole process again.
So something like:
comp1 probed -> comp2 probed -> comp3 -EPROBE_DEFER ->
comp1 skip -> comp2 skip -> comp3 probed
ChenYu
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list