[PATCH] drm/mediatek: Drop dependency on ARM

[mripard at kernel.org]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:52:17PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:48 PM CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu at mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 09:25 +0100, mripard at kernel.org wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 03:30:34AM +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> > > > Hi, Chen-yu:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 19:13 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The recent attempt to make the MediaTek DRM driver build for non-ARM
> > > > > compile tests made the driver unbuildable for arm64 platforms. Since
> > > > > this is used on both ARM and arm64 platforms, just drop the dependency
> > > > > on ARM.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu at mediatek.com>
> > > >
> > > > I find this days ago, but I don't know there is someone who apply it.
> > > > Let this patch go through drm-misc tree which already has the bug patch.
> > >
> > > If you are ok with this patch, why didn't you apply it yourself?
> > >
> > > I think that's very much the expectation, so it's probably took a while to merge.
> >
> > That's ok for me to apply it if drm-misc has no plan to apply it.
> 
> I'm confused. The culprit patch is already in drm-misc. So this one has
> to go in drm-misc as well.
> 
> I can try to apply it to drm-misc myself, or have a colleague assist with
> that. I'll let it sit for another day in case anyone has something to say
> about it.

Sorry, I was under the assumption that CK had drm-misc commit rights? It
should go through drm-misc indeed.

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 273 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/attachments/20241031/5b01f74b/attachment.sig>