[PATCH v6 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl: Pull pinctrl node changes from MT6795 document

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:03:46PM +0300, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
> From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana at protonmail.com>
> 
> mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml has different node name patterns which match
> bindings of other MediaTek pin controllers, ref for pinmux-node.yaml which
> has a description of the pinmux property, as well as some additional
> descriptions for some pin configuration properties. Pull those changes
> into mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml and adjust the example DTS to match in
> preparation to combine the MT6795 document into it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana at protonmail.com>
> ---
>  .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml      | 38 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
> index 3bbc00df5548d..352a88d7b135e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -111,12 +111,12 @@ allOf:
>          - "#interrupt-cells"
>  
>  patternProperties:
> -  '-[0-9]*$':
> +  '-pins$':

Worst case, this could be an ABI break. Best case, it's churn for 
mt6779. Is it worth unifying?

Rob