[PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921

Luiz Augusto von Dentz luiz.dentz at gmail.com
Wed May 8 07:18:44 PDT 2024


Hi,

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:34 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
Leemhuis) <regressions at leemhuis.info> wrote:
>
> On 16.04.24 17:10, patchwork-bot+bluetooth at kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master)
> > by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz at intel.com>:
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:19:22 +0800 you wrote:
> >> Because both MT7920 and MT7921 use the same chip ID.
> >> We use the 8th bit of fw_flavor to distingush MT7920.
> >> The original patch made a mistake to check whole fw_flavor,
> >> that makes the condition both true (dev_id == 0x7961 && fw_flavor),
> >> and makes MT7921 flow wrong.
> >>
> >> In this patch, we correct the flow to get the 8th bit value for MT7920.
> >> And the patch is verified pass with both MT7920 and MT7921.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921
> >     https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/263296438807
>
> Hi! 6.9 is only days close and this is fixing a 6.9 regression, so allow
> me to quickly ask: do you still plan to submit this for mainline merge
> soon? Or did you already and I just missed it? Ciao, Thorsten

It wasn't marked with Fixes or stable though which is what I usually
use as an indicator to backport.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz



More information about the Linux-mediatek mailing list