[PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdosys

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 01/03/24 15:39, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:50:31AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 29/02/24 20:44, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
>>> Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
>>> vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
>>> parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
>>> result in better performance.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
>>> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado at collabora.com>
>>
>> Can you please squash patches 2,3,4 in a single one?
>>
>> It doesn't make a lot of sense to have them separated in this case, only
>> generates commit noise for no practical reason imo.
>>
>> arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add missing gce-client-reg to vpp/vdo/mutex
> 
> I split them like this so that each has its own fixes tag and can all be easily
> backported (as mentioned in the cover letter). That said, the commits fixed in 2
> and 3 both landed in v6.1-rc1, so they could be squashed and still easily
> backported. But the commit fixed in patch 4 only landed in v6.4-rc1, so if we
> squash them all together, the first two won't be backported to v6.1.
> 
> Let me know how you want to proceed.
> 

Oh, I'm sorry I didn't notice that. Ignore my previous comment then, I'll take
those for the next fixes round as-is.

Cheers,
Angelo