[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: gamma: Change MT8195 to single enum group

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 29/02/24 03:35, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
> Since MT8195 gamma has multiple bank for 12 bits LUT and it is
> different from any other SoC LUT setting.
> 
> So we move MT8195 compatible from the one of items to the
> single enum group.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin at mediatek.com>
> ---
>   .../devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml    | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
> index c6641acd75d6..3e6cb8f48bcc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,gamma.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ properties:
>         - enum:
>             - mediatek,mt8173-disp-gamma
>             - mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma
> +          - mediatek,mt8195-disp-gamma
>         - items:
>             - enum:
>                 - mediatek,mt6795-disp-gamma
> @@ -33,7 +34,6 @@ properties:
>                 - mediatek,mt8186-disp-gamma
>                 - mediatek,mt8188-disp-gamma
>                 - mediatek,mt8192-disp-gamma
> -              - mediatek,mt8195-disp-gamma

While I agree on allowing mt8195-disp-gamma to have its own separated compatible
as the IP is actually different from the one in MT8183, you can't do it like that,
or dtbs_check will fail validation for the mt8195 devicetree.

That one declares...

gamma0: gamma at 1c006000 {
	compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-disp-gamma", "mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma";

...Please always run dtbs_check when performing bindings modifications.

Cheers,
Angelo

>             - const: mediatek,mt8183-disp-gamma
>   
>     reg: