Probe regression of efuse at 11f10000 on mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-juniper-sku16 running next-20240202
Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
nfraprado at collabora.com
Tue Feb 6 08:10:56 PST 2024
Hi,
KernelCI has identified a regression [1] on the
mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-juniper-sku16 machine running on next-20240202 compared to
next-20240118:
<4>[ 0.627077] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/nvmem/devices/mtk-efuse0'
<4>[ 0.634945] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-next-20240202 #1
<4>[ 0.642542] Hardware name: Google juniper sku16 board (DT)
<4>[ 0.648237] Call trace:
<4>[ 0.650917] dump_backtrace+0x94/0xec
<4>[ 0.654815] show_stack+0x18/0x24
<4>[ 0.658359] dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60
<4>[ 0.662252] dump_stack+0x18/0x24
<4>[ 0.665796] sysfs_warn_dup+0x64/0x80
<4>[ 0.669688] sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0xf0/0xf8
<4>[ 0.674353] sysfs_create_link+0x20/0x40
<4>[ 0.678500] bus_add_device+0x64/0x104
<4>[ 0.682475] device_add+0x33c/0x778
<4>[ 0.686193] nvmem_register+0x514/0x714
<4>[ 0.690256] devm_nvmem_register+0x1c/0x6c
<4>[ 0.694577] mtk_efuse_probe+0xe8/0x170
<4>[ 0.698637] platform_probe+0x68/0xd8
<4>[ 0.702525] really_probe+0x148/0x2b4
<4>[ 0.706413] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c
<4>[ 0.710990] driver_probe_device+0xdc/0x160
<4>[ 0.715394] __driver_attach+0x94/0x19c
<4>[ 0.719453] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd4
<4>[ 0.723512] driver_attach+0x24/0x30
<4>[ 0.727312] bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x1e8
<4>[ 0.731284] driver_register+0x60/0x128
<4>[ 0.735343] __platform_driver_register+0x28/0x34
<4>[ 0.740265] mtk_efuse_init+0x20/0x5c
<4>[ 0.744155] do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x1b0
<4>[ 0.748214] kernel_init_freeable+0x1c8/0x290
<4>[ 0.752795] kernel_init+0x20/0x1dc
<4>[ 0.756512] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
<4>[ 0.760353] mediatek,efuse: probe of 11f10000.efuse failed with error -17
This efuse probe failure causes the probe failure of other components that
depend on it, including the display pipeline:
/soc/dsi-phy at 11e50000
/soc/dsi at 14014000
/soc/efuse at 11f10000
/soc/i2c at 11008000/anx7625 at 58
/soc/i2c at 11008000/anx7625 at 58/aux-bus/panel
/soc/thermal at 1100b000
There is a series already addressing the issue [2]. The first two patches have
been merged into the mediatek tree, but that tree isn't currently being
integrated into linux-next. Besides that, patch 3 hasn't been merged into the
nvmem tree yet, and it is required in order to solve the issue.
I'm sending this regression report so we can properly track the regression while
the fixes don't land on linux-next.
Thanks,
Nícolas
[1] https://linux.kernelci.org/test/plan/id/65bd63c3f12d8a95e200a225/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20240130095656.3712469-1-wenst@chromium.org/
#regzbot introduced next-20240118..next-20240202
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list