[PATCH v2 01/26] media: pci: mgb4: Refactor struct resources

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 19/04/2024 10:47, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> The struct resource end field is inclusive not exclusive, this is, the
> size is (end - start) +1.

", this is," doesn't parse on my end

"i.e" => that is, would be more appropriate I think.

"The struct resource end field is inclusive not exclusive of the size" 
which I still think is a confusing statement.

Perhaps something much easier to understand is called for

"The struct resource end field signifies the end address not the 
relative offset from the start field i.e size == (end - start) + 1.

Amend the .end field to specify the end address not the relative size 
from the offset as is currently given."

Other than that, I think its reasonable to assume the mapping != 0 - 
0x100 inclusive.

Please consider updating your commit log and if you do add my

Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue at linaro.org>

---
bod