[PATCH v2 5/8] dt-bindings: ufs: mediatek,ufs: Document MT8192 compatible with MT8183

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 11/04/24 17:07, Conor Dooley ha scritto:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:42:57PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> The MT8192 UFS controller is compatible with the MT8183 one:
>> document this by allowing to assign both compatible strings
>> "mediatek,mt8192-ufshci", "mediatek,mt8183-ufshci" to the UFSHCI node.
>>
>> In preparation for adding MT8195 to the mix, the MT8192 compatible
>> was added as enum instead of const.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/mediatek,ufs.yaml        | 12 +++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/mediatek,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/mediatek,ufs.yaml
>> index 32fd535a514a..adcd13023866 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/mediatek,ufs.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/mediatek,ufs.yaml
>> @@ -14,9 +14,15 @@ allOf:
>>   
>>   properties:
>>     compatible:
>> -    enum:
>> -      - mediatek,mt8183-ufshci
>> -      - mediatek,mt8192-ufshci
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - items:
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - mediatek,mt8183-ufshci
>> +              - mediatek,mt8192-ufshci
>> +      - items:
>> +          - enum:
>> +              - mediatek,mt8192-ufshci
>> +          - const: mediatek,mt8183-ufshci
> 
> It's a bit more distruptive since you'll have to modify a dts, but why
> permit both of these ways of describing the mt8192? Could we drop it
> from the original enum and no longer allow it in isolation? There
> shouldn't be any compatibility concerns with doing so.

Yes, will remove that in v3 :-)

Thanks!
Angelo