[PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8188 SCP core 1
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Thu Apr 11 00:33:12 PDT 2024
Il 11/04/24 05:37, olivia.wen ha scritto:
> To Support MT8188 SCP core 1 for ISP driver.
> The SCP on different chips will require different code sizes
> and IPI buffer sizes based on varying requirements.
>
> Signed-off-by: olivia.wen <olivia.wen at mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h | 5 +--
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c | 9 ++++--
> include/linux/remoteproc/mtk_scp.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index 6d7736a..8f37f65 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
> #define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET 0x850d0
>
> #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN 32
> -#define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE 288
>
> struct scp_run {
> u32 signaled;
> @@ -110,6 +109,8 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_data {
> u32 host_to_scp_int_bit;
>
> size_t ipi_buf_offset;
> + u32 ipi_buffer_size;
this should be `ipi_share_buf_size`
> + u32 max_code_size;
max_code_size should probably be dram_code_size or max_dram_size or dram_size.
Also, both should be size_t, not u32.
> };
>
> struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
> @@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ struct mtk_scp {
> struct mtk_share_obj {
> u32 id;
> u32 len;
> - u8 share_buf[SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE];
> + u8 *share_buf;
> };
>
> void scp_memcpy_aligned(void __iomem *dst, const void *src, unsigned int len);
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index 6751829..270718d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> #include "mtk_common.h"
> #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>
> -#define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
> #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
>
> /**
> @@ -94,14 +93,14 @@ static void scp_ipi_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> {
> struct mtk_share_obj __iomem *rcv_obj = scp->recv_buf;
> struct scp_ipi_desc *ipi_desc = scp->ipi_desc;
> - u8 tmp_data[SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE];
> + u8 *tmp_data;
> scp_ipi_handler_t handler;
> u32 id = readl(&rcv_obj->id);
> u32 len = readl(&rcv_obj->len);
>
> - if (len > SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE) {
> + if (len > scp->data->ipi_buffer_size) {
> dev_err(scp->dev, "ipi message too long (len %d, max %d)", len,
> - SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE);
> + scp->data->ipi_buffer_size);
> return;
> }
> if (id >= SCP_IPI_MAX) {
> @@ -109,6 +108,10 @@ static void scp_ipi_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> return;
> }
>
> + tmp_data = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
I think that this will be impacting on performance a bit, especially if
the scp_ipi_handler gets called frequently (and also remember that this
is in interrupt context).
For best performance, you should allocate this at probe time (in struct mtk_scp
or somewhere else), then:
len = ipi message length
memset zero the tmp_data from len to ipi_buffer_size
memcpy_fromio(....) etc
> + if (!tmp_data)
> + return;
> +
> scp_ipi_lock(scp, id);
> handler = ipi_desc[id].handler;
> if (!handler) {
> @@ -123,6 +126,7 @@ static void scp_ipi_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>
> scp->ipi_id_ack[id] = true;
> wake_up(&scp->ack_wq);
> + kfree(tmp_data);
There's a possible memory leak. You forgot to kfree in the NULL handler path.
> }
>
> static int scp_elf_read_ipi_buf_addr(struct mtk_scp *scp,
> @@ -133,6 +137,7 @@ static int scp_ipi_init(struct mtk_scp *scp, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> int ret;
> size_t buf_sz, offset;
> + size_t share_buf_offset;
>
> /* read the ipi buf addr from FW itself first */
> ret = scp_elf_read_ipi_buf_addr(scp, fw, &offset);
> @@ -154,10 +159,12 @@ static int scp_ipi_init(struct mtk_scp *scp, const struct firmware *fw)
>
> scp->recv_buf = (struct mtk_share_obj __iomem *)
> (scp->sram_base + offset);
> + share_buf_offset = sizeof(scp->recv_buf->id)
> + + sizeof(scp->recv_buf->len) + scp->data->ipi_buffer_size;
> scp->send_buf = (struct mtk_share_obj __iomem *)
> - (scp->sram_base + offset + sizeof(*scp->recv_buf));
> - memset_io(scp->recv_buf, 0, sizeof(*scp->recv_buf));
> - memset_io(scp->send_buf, 0, sizeof(*scp->send_buf));
> + (scp->sram_base + offset + share_buf_offset);
> + memset_io(scp->recv_buf, 0, share_buf_offset);
> + memset_io(scp->send_buf, 0, share_buf_offset);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -891,7 +898,7 @@ static int scp_map_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> }
>
> /* Reserved SCP code size */
> - scp->dram_size = MAX_CODE_SIZE;
> + scp->dram_size = scp->data->max_code_size;
Remove the dram_size member from struct mtk_scp and use max_code_size directly.
> scp->cpu_addr = dma_alloc_coherent(scp->dev, scp->dram_size,
> &scp->dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!scp->cpu_addr)
> @@ -1247,6 +1254,8 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
> .host_to_scp_reg = MT8183_HOST_TO_SCP,
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8183_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> .ipi_buf_offset = 0x7bdb0,
> + .max_code_size = 0x500000,
> + .ipi_buffer_size = 288,
> };
>
> static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8186_of_data = {
> @@ -1260,18 +1269,22 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8186_of_data = {
> .host_to_scp_reg = MT8183_HOST_TO_SCP,
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8183_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> .ipi_buf_offset = 0x3bdb0,
> + .max_code_size = 0x500000,
> + .ipi_buffer_size = 288,
> };
>
> static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8188_of_data = {
> .scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
> - .scp_before_load = mt8192_scp_before_load,
> - .scp_irq_handler = mt8192_scp_irq_handler,
> + .scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_before_load,
> + .scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_irq_handler,
You should mention the reason of this change in the commit description, or better,
you should make a separate commit with a Fixes tag for this.
> .scp_reset_assert = mt8192_scp_reset_assert,
> .scp_reset_deassert = mt8192_scp_reset_deassert,
> - .scp_stop = mt8192_scp_stop,
> + .scp_stop = mt8195_scp_stop,
> .scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
> .host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> + .max_code_size = 0x500000,
> + .ipi_buffer_size = 600,
> };
>
> static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8192_of_data = {
> @@ -1284,6 +1297,8 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8192_of_data = {
> .scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
> .host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> + .max_code_size = 0x500000,
> + .ipi_buffer_size = 288,
> };
>
> static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
> @@ -1296,6 +1311,8 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
> .scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
> .host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> + .max_code_size = 0x500000,
> + .ipi_buffer_size = 288,
> };
>
> static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
> @@ -1308,6 +1325,22 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
> .scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
> .host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
> .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> + .max_code_size = 0x500000,
> + .ipi_buffer_size = 288,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8188_of_data_c1 = {
> + .scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
> + .scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_c1_before_load,
> + .scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler,
> + .scp_reset_assert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert,
> + .scp_reset_deassert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert,
> + .scp_stop = mt8195_scp_c1_stop,
> + .scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
> + .host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
> + .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
> + .max_code_size = 0xA00000,
> + .ipi_buffer_size = 600,
I wonder if it's more sensible to add a new struct instead,
so that you can define
static const struct mtk_scp_sizes_data mt8188_scp_sizes = {
.max_code_size = 0xA00000,
.ipi_buffer_size = 600
};
...and then reuse like
static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8188_of_data_c1 = {
..... stuff .....
.scp_sizes = &mt8188_scp_sizes
};
...that'd be more important for mt8192, 95 and the others as those params
would be reused many, many times.
> };
>
> static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> @@ -1316,6 +1349,12 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
> NULL
> };
>
> +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8188_of_data_cores[] = {
> + &mt8188_of_data,
> + &mt8188_of_data_c1,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
> @@ -1323,6 +1362,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp-dual", .data = &mt8188_of_data_cores },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
> index cd0b601..4ef5491 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.c
> @@ -162,10 +162,12 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
> struct mtk_share_obj __iomem *send_obj = scp->send_buf;
> u32 val;
> int ret;
> + size_t share_buf_offset;
> + void __iomem *share_buf_io_address;
>
> if (WARN_ON(id <= SCP_IPI_INIT) || WARN_ON(id >= SCP_IPI_MAX) ||
> WARN_ON(id == SCP_IPI_NS_SERVICE) ||
> - WARN_ON(len > sizeof(send_obj->share_buf)) || WARN_ON(!buf))
> + WARN_ON(len > scp->data->ipi_buffer_size) || WARN_ON(!buf))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(scp->clk);
> @@ -184,7 +186,10 @@ int scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 id, void *buf, unsigned int len,
> goto unlock_mutex;
> }
>
> - scp_memcpy_aligned(send_obj->share_buf, buf, len);
> + share_buf_offset = offsetof(struct mtk_share_obj, share_buf);
> + share_buf_io_address = (void __iomem *)((uintptr_t)scp->send_buf + share_buf_offset);
> +
> + scp_memcpy_aligned(share_buf_io_address, buf, len);
>
> writel(len, &send_obj->len);
> writel(id, &send_obj->id);
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc/mtk_scp.h b/include/linux/remoteproc/mtk_scp.h
> index 7c2b7cc9..344ff41 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc/mtk_scp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc/mtk_scp.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ enum scp_ipi_id {
> SCP_IPI_CROS_HOST_CMD,
> SCP_IPI_VDEC_LAT,
> SCP_IPI_VDEC_CORE,
> + SCP_IPI_IMGSYS_CMD,
There's no mention of the addition of this new IPI ID in the commit description.
Please write something about it.
Cheers,
Angelo
> SCP_IPI_NS_SERVICE = 0xFF,
> SCP_IPI_MAX = 0x100,
> };
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list