[PATCH v7 07/49] media: sti: hva: Use vb2_get_buffer() instead of directly access to buffers array

[Hans Verkuil]

On 19/09/2023 12:26, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> 
> Le 19/09/2023 à 11:31, Hans Verkuil a écrit :
>> On 14/09/2023 15:32, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>> Use vb2_get_buffer() instead of directly access to vb2_buffer buffer array.
>>> This could allow to change the type bufs[] field of vb2_buffer structure if
>>> needed.
>>> After each call to vb2_get_buffer() we need to be sure that we get
>>> a valid pointer so check the return value of all of them.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/media/platform/st/sti/hva/hva-v4l2.c | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/st/sti/hva/hva-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/platform/st/sti/hva/hva-v4l2.c
>>> index 3a848ca32a0e..326be09bdb55 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/st/sti/hva/hva-v4l2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/st/sti/hva/hva-v4l2.c
>>> @@ -577,6 +577,10 @@ static int hva_qbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, struct v4l2_buffer *buf)
>>>           }
>> Above this line there is a buf->index check...
>>
>>>             vb2_buf = vb2_get_buffer(vq, buf->index);
>>> +        if (!vb2_buf) {
>>> +            dev_dbg(dev, "%s buffer index %d not found\n", ctx->name, buf->index);
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>> +        }
>> ...I think that check can be dropped since vb2_get_buffer checks that already.
> 
> No because in "media: sti: hva: Stop direct calls to queue num_buffers field" patch
> I remove the above check since it use queue num_buffers field.

Why not do that here? And drop that later patch? It doesn't make sense to
split it up, and also the commit log of patch 33/49 doesn't match that patch.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> Regards,
> Benjamin
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>     Hans
>>
>>>           stream = to_hva_stream(to_vb2_v4l2_buffer(vb2_buf));
>>>           stream->bytesused = buf->bytesused;
>>>       }
>>