[PATCH] remoteproc: mediatek: Detect single/multi core SCP with rpmsg-name property

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 5:26 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 19/09/23 07:03, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> > In the just landed multi-core SCP work, detection of single/multi core
> > SCP is done by checking the immediate child node of the SCP complex
> > device node. In the original work this was done by matching the child
> > node's name. However the name wasn't previously standardized. This
> > resulted in breakage on MT8183 and MT8192 Chromebooks while the driver
> > side changes were picked up and the device tree changes were not picked
> > up.
> >
> > Instead, match against the "mediatek,rpmsg-name" property, which is
> > required to be present in the rpmsg sub-node. This makes the
> > aforementioned devices running old device trees working again.
> >
> > Reported-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao at collabora.com>
> > Fixes: 1fdbf0cdde98 ("remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP")
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst at chromium.org>
> > ---
> > The patch is based on next-20230918 with a whole bunch of local patches
> > stacked on top. None of my local patches are related to remoteproc, so
> > it should be fine.
> >
> > I tested on both MT8183 Juniper and MT8192 Hayato and on both systems
> > the SCP successfully probed again.
>
> Instead of checking "mediatek,rpmsg-name", I think that a better way of checking if
> this is single or multi core is to count the number of cores...
>
> I've sent my own version of this, please check [1].

My version checks the structure of the device node, much like the original
code, just against a different property/node name. If it's multi-core,
there would be sub-nodes for each core, and the rpmsg property would be
under those.

Either way works. What we need right now is a quick fix to get things
working again. We can discuss how to make things better later.

Honestly I think it should just be based on the compatible string. However
the current design seems quite fragile. The driver probably can't handle
the core device nodes being out of order.


ChenYu