Re: regression with 33140e668b10 thermal/drivers/mediatek: Control buffer enablement tweaks

[Frank Wunderlich]

Am 12. September 2023 15:46:17 MESZ schrieb Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>:
>Hi Frank and Daniel,
>
>On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 02:57:45PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Frank,
>> 
>> thanks for reporting and investigating the issue.
>> 
>> 
>> On 31/08/2023 15:34, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > looked a bit deeper into it and it looks like i only need to add the fields in the mtk_thermal_data struct
>> > 
>> > --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/auxadc_thermal.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/auxadc_thermal.c
>> > @@ -690,6 +690,9 @@ static const struct mtk_thermal_data mt7986_thermal_data = {
>> >          .adcpnp = mt7986_adcpnp,
>> >          .sensor_mux_values = mt7986_mux_values,
>> >          .version = MTK_THERMAL_V3,
>> > +       .apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg = APMIXED_SYS_TS_CON1,
>> > +       .apmixed_buffer_ctl_mask = GENMASK(31, 6) | BIT(3),
>> > +       .apmixed_buffer_ctl_set = BIT(0),
>> >   };
>> > 
>> > in my quick test the temprature can be read again and i'm near room temperature...i though it was a bit higher before, but as far as i understand the code, the values were fixed before and only made it configurable.
>> > 
>> > if someone can confirm that i'm right, i can send official patch.
>
>Sorry for the delay, this was in my inbox but somehow not on my todo
>list.
>
>The patch looks correct. I think I simply missed adding the fields for
>MTK_THERMAL_V3 chips. Sorry!
>
>> 
>> At the first glance, it seems the proposed change is correct and could be
>> proposed as a hot fix.
>> 
>> However, the conditions with the version and the apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg
>> looks a bit fuzzy.
>> 
>> Markus, can you revisit this part of code and consolidate the configurable
>> approach ?
>
>Yes, it indeed looks like I broke another condition there. I will give
>it another close look and send a fix.
>
>Best,
>Markus

Hi

I already sent the Patch below

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20230907112018.52811-1-linux@fw-web.de/

If it is correct (handled the same way as mt7622 before) you have not to send a patch.

But you should maybe check condition !=V2 is correct when loocking on v3.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/thermal/mediatek/auxadc_thermal.c?id=33140e668b10200b775779f302b143b32e6ae7ca

Regards Frank