[PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: add mt8395-evk board

[Macpaul Lin]

On 9/11/23 14:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 	
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you 
> have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> On 10/09/2023 14:23, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/10/23 18:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>> External email : Please do nost click links or open attachments until you 
>>> have verified the sender or the content.
>>>
>>> On 09/09/2023 15:28, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>> 1. Add compatible for MT8395.
>>>> 2. Add bindings for the MediaTek mt8395-evk board, also known
>>>> as the "Genio 1200-EVK".
>>>>
>>>> The MT8195 and MT8395 belong to the same SoC family,
>>>> with only minor differences in their physical characteristics.
>>>> They utilize unique efuse values for differentiation.
>>>>
>>>> The booting process and configurations are managed by boot
>>>> loaders, firmware, and TF-A. Consequently, the part numbers
>>>> and procurement channels vary.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin at mediatek.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>> 
>> Changes for v4:
>> Changes for v5:
>>   - No change, update Reviewed-by tag only. Thanks.
>> 
>> The explanation is here. The version v4 and v5 are the same.
>> For sending v5 is because "Patch v5 2/2" has been updated and these 2 
>> patches were in the same patch set. I think to update the whole patch 
>> set together with a single modified patch should be a usual operation.
>> Did I miss anything?
> 
> Yeah, like not top-posting.
> 
> Why do you change the same line in other patchset?

Hmm, they are different patch actually.
I've tested the patch v5 here can be applied with / without mt8365's 
description patch independently.
I'm not sure why the patch show the patch started from the same line number.
@@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ properties:
But these 2 patch sets seems won't be conflict at my local.

>> 
>>> Confusing. You just sent a patch changing the same hunk - adding
>>> description, without any explanation.
>>>
>> 
>> The marketing naming rule of MediaTek SOCs are usually confusing people. 
>> I guess the previous patch just confused you. Ha.
> 
> ?
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
Thanks
Macpaul Lin