[PATCH v11 06/56] media: videobuf2: Remove duplicated index vs q->num_buffers check

[Benjamin Gaignard]

vb2_get_buffer() already checks if the requested index is valid.
Stop duplicating this kind of check everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at collabora.com>
---
 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 13 -------------
 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
index 3395e702ad1f..b9df2bdae389 100644
--- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
+++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
@@ -378,11 +378,6 @@ static int vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *md
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
-		dprintk(q, 1, "%s: buffer index out of range\n", opname);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
 	if (!vb) {
 		dprintk(q, 1, "%s: buffer %u is NULL\n", opname,  b->index);
@@ -829,10 +824,6 @@ int vb2_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *mdev,
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
-	if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
-		dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
 	vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
 	if (!vb) {
 		dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", b->index);
@@ -904,10 +895,6 @@ int vb2_expbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_exportbuffer *eb)
 {
 	struct vb2_buffer *vb;
 
-	if (eb->index >= q->num_buffers) {
-		dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
 	vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, eb->index);
 	if (!vb) {
 		dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", eb->index);
-- 
2.39.2