[PATCH net-next 08/30] net: dsa: mt7530: change p{5,6}_interface to p{5,6}_configured

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 09:49:58AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 24.05.2023 20:51, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:10PM +0300, arinc9.unal at gmail.com wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> > > index 710c6622d648..d837aa20968c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> > > @@ -2728,25 +2722,20 @@ mt753x_phylink_mac_config(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, unsigned int mode,
> > >   			goto unsupported;
> > >   		break;
> > >   	case 5: /* Port 5, can be used as a CPU port. */
> > > -		if (priv->p5_interface == state->interface)
> > > +		if (priv->p5_configured)
> > >   			break;
> > >   		if (mt753x_mac_config(ds, port, mode, state) < 0)
> > >   			goto unsupported;
> > > -
> > > -		if (priv->p5_intf_sel != P5_DISABLED)
> > > -			priv->p5_interface = state->interface;
> > 
> > If you don't replace this bit with anything, who will set priv->p5_configured
> > for mt7530?
> 
> I intend priv->p5_configured and priv->p6_configured to be only used for
> MT7531 as I have stated on the mt7530_priv description.

Ok, but given the premise of this patch set, that phylink is always available,
does it make sense for mt7531_cpu_port_config() and mt7988_cpu_port_config()
to manually call phylink methods?