[PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: Replace deprecated extcon-usb-gpio id-gpio/vbus-gpio properties

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 24/07/2023 08:05, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2023, 14:22:06 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 21/07/2023 10:19, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>> Use id-gpios and vbus-gpios instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com>
>>> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> #rockchip
>>> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com> #mediatek
>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo
>>> <shawnguo at kernel.org>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> * Rebased to next-20230721
>>> * Split from bindings patch
>>
>> I think you wanted to split it per subsystem, right? That's why you
>> resent/v3? But the split did not happen.
> 
> Yes, I split it into dt bindings and DT changes patches. Is this not correct?

We talked about DTS patch - this one. It was already split between
bindings and DTS, so this would not have been a topic at all.

> 
>> If you decide not to split,
>> then try to figure out: who should pick up this patchset?
> 
> Well, intention was one patch for DT bindings maintainers and these two 
> patches for imx maintainer (Shawn AFAIK).

You touch there much more than IMX, so if you intend that you need to be
pretty clear. I see there around 5% of changes from IMX, so targeting
IMX is a weird choice.


> I've send patches separated by arch/
> arm and arch/arm64 in one series, so I'm slightly confused now.

So telling you second time - don't. Split per subsystem.

Best regards,
Krzysztof