[PATCH] drm: Explicitly include correct DT includes
Heiko Stuebner
heiko at sntech.de
Sun Jul 16 02:25:03 PDT 2023
Am Freitag, 14. Juli 2023, 19:45:34 CEST schrieb Rob Herring:
> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> explicitly include the correct includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> index 917e79951aac..2744d8f4a6fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
I'm not sure if I'm just misreading something, but in all other places
of_device.h gets removed while here is stays as an include. Is this
correct this way?
Thanks
Heiko
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list