[PATCH v12 2/6] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers dt-binding definition

[Matthias Brugger]

On 30/01/2023 13:19, Balsam CHIHI wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:18 PM Matthias Brugger
> <matthias.bgg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30/01/2023 11:40, Balsam CHIHI wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the feedback.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:48 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 26/01/2023 17:10, bchihi at baylibre.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi at baylibre.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add LVTS thermal controllers dt-binding definition for mt8195.
>>>>
>>>> Subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-binding definition". The
>>>> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
>>>
>>> fixed.
>>> The patch title has been fixed as you suggested :
>>> "dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers"
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Plus two comments at the end.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi at baylibre.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>     v12:
>>>>>        - Fixed subject prefix
>>>>>        - Fixed licences GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
>>>>>        - Added dual licenses
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +    };
>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..902d5b1e4f43
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
>>>>
>>>> Same filename as bindings.
>>>
>>> fixed.
>>> rename :
>>> include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h =>
>>> include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts-thermal.h
>>>
>>
>> I think it should be
>> include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek,lvts-thermal.yaml
> 
> OK,
> I will change it like that.
> (".h" and not ".yaml" I believe (just to be sure).).
> 

Yes sure, .h. Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
Matthias

>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or MIT) */
>>>>
>>>> Although this is correct, any reason why not using exactly the same
>>>> license as bindings?
>>>
>>> fixed.
>>> both files are now using the same license :
>>> "SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or MIT)"
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023 MediaTek Inc.
>>>>> + * Author: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi at baylibre.com>
>>>>> + */
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll send the changes soon.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Balsam
> 
> Best regards,
> Balsam