[PATCH net-next] net: pcs: lynxi: fully reconfigure if link is down
Russell King (Oracle)
linux at armlinux.org.uk
Thu Aug 17 06:30:51 PDT 2023
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 04:13:44PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> btw is it a thread-safe to check the mpcs->interface member?
> I've quick checked and phylink_pcs_config can be invoked from different places
> and the code below does the following assignment:
> mpcs->interface = interface;
pcs_config is called from:
- phylink_change_inband_advert() while holding pl->state_mutex
- phylink_major_config()
phylink_major_config() is called from:
- phylink_resolve() while holding pl->state_mutex
- phylink_ethtool_ksettings_set() while holding pl->state_mutex
- phylink_mac_initial_config()
phylink_mac_initial_config() is called from:
- phylink_resume()
- phylink_start()
In both cases, these are called without holding pl->state_mutex, so
one may think that they could be unsafe. In both cases, however,
pl->phylink_disable_state is non-zero.
phylink_change_inband_advert() will check whether
PHYLINK_DISABLE_STOPPED is set, and not proceed to call pcs_config()
in that case. In the phylink_resume() case, userspace isn't running,
so there can't be a call to phylink_change_inband_advert().
So, one can assume (as must be the case of course, we're fiddling
with hardware) that pcs_config() will always be run without another
thread also running it for the same hardware. Two over-lapping
pcs_config() calls would lead to an indeterminant hardware state.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list