[PATCH v8 net-next 02/12] net: bridge: add blackhole fdb entry flag
netdev at kapio-technology.com
netdev at kapio-technology.com
Sat Oct 22 22:32:02 PDT 2022
On 2022-10-20 15:06, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> [...]
>
>> @@ -1140,7 +1148,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
>> struct net_bridge *br,
>> err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true);
>> } else {
>> spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
>> - err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, nfea_tb);
>> + err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, ext_flags,
>> nfea_tb);
>
> I believe the preference is to wrap to 80 columns when possible.
Very strange... since I ran checkpatch.pl from the net-next kernel
itself and it did not
give me any warnings about 80 columns, but rather said 'patch is ready
for submission'.
As this is silent, could it be some missing python plugins or something
to do with perl?
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list