[PATCH v3 05/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795: Fix interrupt count

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 01:47:18PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 10/10/22 13:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> > On 07/10/2022 08:58, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
> > > From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana at protonmail.com>
> > > 
> > > The document currently states a maximum of 1 interrupt, but the DT
> > > has 2 specified causing a dtbs_check error. Replace the maximum limit
> > > with a minimum and add per-interrupt descriptions to pass the check.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana at protonmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml | 5 ++++-
> > >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml
> > > index 73ae6e11410b..a3a3f7fb9605 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml
> > > @@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ properties:
> > >     interrupts:
> > >       description: The interrupt outputs to sysirq.
> > > -    maxItems: 1
> > > +    minItems: 1
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - description: EINT interrupt
> > > +      - description: EINT event_b interrupt
> > 
> > Is second interrupt really optional or you just wanted to silence the
> > warning?
> > 
> 
> The event_b interrupt exists (and fires on certain events, if configured to do so),
> but it's currently unused.
> 
> It's really optional.

Optional for DT means may or may not be wired up in the h/w, not what 
some OS 'currently' uses.

However, you can't really add new required properties or entries to an 
existing DT without breaking compatibility. Maybe that is not yet a 
concern.

Rob