[PATCH v3 net-next 04/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: allow additional ethernet-port properties

[Colin Foster]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 05:27:59PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 02:47:28PM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> > Explicitly allow additional properties for both the ethernet-port and
> > ethernet-ports properties. This specifically will allow the qca8k.yaml
> > binding to use shared properties.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster at in-advantage.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2 -> v3
> >   * No change
> > 
> > v1 -> v2
> >   * New patch
> > 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml
> > index bd1f0f7c14a8..87475c2ab092 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml
> > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ patternProperties:
> >        '#size-cells':
> >          const: 0
> >  
> > +    additionalProperties: true
> > +
> 
> Where then do we restrict adding properties to ethernet-ports nodes?
> 
> >      patternProperties:
> >        "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
> >          type: object
> > @@ -45,7 +47,7 @@ patternProperties:
> >  
> >          $ref: dsa-port.yaml#
> >  
> > -        unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +        unevaluatedProperties: true
> 
> Same question for ethernet-port nodes.

For ethernet-port nodes, the qca8k has unevaluatedProperties: false. But
the fact that you're asking this question means I probably misunderstood
something...

For the ethernet-ports node, I'm curious if my other follow-up answers
that question where I realized dsa.yaml should, under the base
definition, have additionalPrpoerties: false. But again, my guess is
that isn't the case.


> 
> >  
> >  oneOf:
> >    - required:
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> >