[PATCH v28 01/11] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add vdosys1 compatible for MT8195
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at gmail.com
Thu Nov 10 05:10:30 PST 2022
On 09/11/2022 06:10, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 18:46 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 07/11/2022 08:22, Nancy.Lin wrote:
>> > Add vdosys1 mmsys compatible for MT8195 platform.
>> >
>> > For MT8195, VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 are 2 display HW pipelines binding
>> > to
>> > 2 different power domains, different clock drivers and different
>> > mediatek-drm drivers.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin at mediatek.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado at collabora.com>
>> > ---
>> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml | 4
>> > +++-
>> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git
>> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
>> > l
>> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
>> > l
>> > index 0711f1834fbd..aaabe2196185 100644
>> > ---
>> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
>> > l
>> > +++
>> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
>> > l
>> > @@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ properties:
>> > - const: syscon
>> >
>> > - items:
>> > - - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
>> > + - enum:
>> > + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
>> > + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1
>> > - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
>> > - const: syscon
>> >
>>
>> I think we had that several times already:
>>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6bbe9527-ae48-30e0-fb45-519223a744d7@linaro.org/
>>
>> We will something like this, but please check that this does not give
>> any
>> errors/warnings:
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
>> index eb451bec23d3d..8e9c4f4d7c389 100644
>> ---
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
>> +++
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml
>> @@ -32,13 +32,22 @@ properties:
>> - mediatek,mt8183-mmsys
>> - mediatek,mt8186-mmsys
>> - mediatek,mt8192-mmsys
>> - - mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
>> - mediatek,mt8365-mmsys
>> - const: syscon
>> - items:
>> - const: mediatek,mt7623-mmsys
>> - const: mediatek,mt2701-mmsys
>> - const: syscon
>> + - items:
>> + - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
>> + - const: syscon
>> + - items:
>> + - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1
>> + - const: syscon
>> + - items:
>> + - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
>> + - const: syscon
>> + deprecated: true
>>
>> reg:
>> maxItems: 1
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> As the vdosys0 previous reviewed patch:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220927152704.12018-2-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com/
> Should I modify the vdosys0 items format like your example?
>
> Or should vdosys1 add items format like vdosys0's previous patch?
> - items:
> - const: mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1
> - const: mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
> - const: syscon
>
No, vdosys1 must not have mediatek,mt8195-mmsys fallback.
Regards,
Matthias
> Regards,
> Jason-JH.Lin
>
>
>
> ************* MEDIATEK Confidentiality Notice
> ********************
> The information contained in this e-mail message (including any
> attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise
> exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be
> conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination,
> distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its
> attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may
> be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe
>
> that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of
> this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not
> disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list