[PATCH v9 01/22] dt-bindings: mediatek, dpi: Add DP_INTF compatible

[Guillaume Ranquet]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:57, Maxime Ripard <maxime at cerno.tech> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:39:06AM +0200, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
>> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
>>
>> DP_INTF is similar to DPI but does not have the exact same feature set
>> or register layouts.
>>
>> DP_INTF is the sink of the display pipeline that is connected to the
>> DisplayPort controller and encoder unit. It takes the same clocks as
>> DPI.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet at baylibre.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml       | 11 ++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
>> index dd2896a40ff0..2dba80ad3b18 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
>> @@ -4,16 +4,16 @@
>>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml#
>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>
>> -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings
>> +title: mediatek DPI/DP_INTF Controller
>>
>>  maintainers:
>>    - CK Hu <ck.hu at mediatek.com>
>>    - Jitao shi <jitao.shi at mediatek.com>
>>
>>  description: |
>> -  The Mediatek DPI function block is a sink of the display subsystem and
>> -  provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a parallel
>> -  output bus.
>> +  The Mediatek DPI and DP_INTF function blocks are a sink of the display
>> +  subsystem and provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a
>> +  parallel output bus.
>>
>>  properties:
>>    compatible:
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>>        - mediatek,mt8173-dpi
>>        - mediatek,mt8183-dpi
>>        - mediatek,mt8192-dpi
>> +      - mediatek,mt8195-dpintf
>
>It seems a bit weird to have all instances of DP_INTF with a separator
>but the compatible doesn't have one?
>
>Is there a reason to not use dp-intf?

None that I know of, It was taken as is from the vendor tree.
I'll use dp-intf in v10 for the sake of consistency.

Thx,
Guillaume.

>
>Maxime