[PATCH v15 00/12] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for mt8195

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 14/02/22 11:13, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
> Hello Matthias,
> 
> The DRM parts are all reviewed by Chun-Kuang.
> Can you spare some time to give us some suggestion for mmsys parts?
> 
> Or do you think we should separate the driver of mmsys related patches
> to another series and resend again?
> Would it be better to combine mmsys related patches from vdosys0 [1]
> and vdosys1 [2] series?
> 
> e.g.
> [v1,0/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 mmsys support
> [v1,1/7] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add power and gce
> properties
> [v1,2/7] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding
> [v1,3/7] dt-bindings: reset: mt8195: add vdosys1 reset control bit
> [v1,4/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys0
> [v1,5/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys1
> [v1,6/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys config API for mt8195
> vdosys1
> [v1,7/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: modify reset controller for MT8195
> vdosys1
> 
> ---
> [1] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for mt8195
> -
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=608548
> [2] Add MediaTek SoC DRM (vdosys1) support for mt8195
> -
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=604065
> ---
> 
> Regards,
> Jason-JH.Lin
> 

Hello everyone,

I think that all the drm/mediatek and soc/mediatek patches in this series
are safe and ready (and also tested for regressions on older SoCs).

Feel free to pick them in your trees.

Cheers,
Angelo