[PATCH v2 3/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Remove the domain->ops comparison
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Wed Jun 22 00:54:45 PDT 2022
On 2022-06-16 23:23, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 06:40:14AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
>>> The domain->ops validation was added, as a precaution, for mixed-driver
>>> systems. However, at this moment only one iommu driver is possible. So
>>> remove it.
>>
>> It's true on a physical platform. But I'm not sure whether a virtual platform
>> is allowed to include multiple e.g. one virtio-iommu alongside a virtual VT-d
>> or a virtual smmu. It might be clearer to claim that (as Robin pointed out)
>> there is plenty more significant problems than this to solve instead of simply
>> saying that only one iommu driver is possible if we don't have explicit code
>> to reject such configuration. 😊
>
> Will edit this part. Thanks!
Oh, physical platforms with mixed IOMMUs definitely exist already. The
main point is that while bus_set_iommu still exists, the core code
effectively *does* prevent multiple drivers from registering - even in
emulated cases like the example above, virtio-iommu and VT-d would both
try to bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type), and one of them will lose. The
aspect which might warrant clarification is that there's no combination
of supported drivers which claim non-overlapping buses *and* could
appear in the same system - even if you tried to contrive something by
emulating, say, VT-d (PCI) alongside rockchip-iommu (platform), you
could still only describe one or the other due to ACPI vs. Devicetree.
Thanks,
Robin.
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list