[PATCH v2 0/4] add new SoC mt8186 support for spi-mtk-nor

[Guochun Mao]

Hi Mark, Angelo, Rob,

Thank you very much.

Guochun


On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 10:21 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 22:28:16 +0800, guochun.mao at mediatek.com wrote:
> > These patches is mainly for adding mt8186 support.
> > The spi nor controller of mt8186 has some differences,
> > it needs one more clk, axi_s, for dma feature.
> > And also needs one extra dummy bit when read flash registers.
> > 
> > The version 2 patches fix some typos for bindings file,
> > correct return value of probe function in spi-mtk-nor.c file,
> > and add some comments to explain why add extra dummy bit.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
> for-next
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1/4] dt-bindings: spi: add mt8186-nor compatible string
>       commit: ceab11a3c0d620d9ec2c032fd8014615cf7934ec
> [2/4] spi: spi-mtk-nor: improve device table for adding more
> capabilities
>       commit: 5b177234e9fde7d4208e8163debc109b86e3f68d
> [3/4] spi: spi-mtk-nor: add new soc mt8186 support
>       commit: 4e8bfe5cdf77621cb4e7b196448ceeff20d9d6a6
> [4/4] spi: spi-mtk-nor: add axi_s clock for mt8186
>       commit: 58b0a653b8dac40bbeb01a2c8a230aa8f84a7530
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-
> next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual
> testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems
> and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if
> needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes
> they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when
> replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark