(subset) [PATCH 0/4] mfd/pwm: dt-bindings: google, cros-ec: include generic pwm schema

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 23/02/2022 07:22, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:08AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel
>>> depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (4):
>>>   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema
>>>   arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>   arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>   arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema
>>       commit: 474a84be692d893f45a54b405dcbc137cbf77949
> 
> I expected that all patches in this series go in together via an ARM
> tree. Or are there expectations that this goes via PWM?

I would propose to pick individual patches by each maintainer. bindings
by PWM tree (Rob acked it) and DTS via each SoC tree.

Such approach gives flexibility, although `make dtbs_check` will spot
the new errors when run in PWM tree. Next will be fine, though.

Best regards,
Krzysztof