[PATCH v2] wifi: mt76: fix potential memory leakage
lorenzo at kernel.org
lorenzo at kernel.org
Thu Dec 22 06:26:21 PST 2022
> On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 10:44 +0100, lorenzo at kernel.org wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-12-21 at 19:02 +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > On Dec 21, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > > > > Hi Sujuan,
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, it is so expensive, but if no memcopy, it will casue
> > > > > > memory
> > > > > > fragmentation (we hit this issue in internal SQC).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > as we know, wed needs to exchange rx pkt(belongs to wed rx
> > > > > > buffer
> > > > > > manager) with wifi driver(dma rx data queue) by exchanging
> > > > > > wfdma
> > > > > > dmad
> > > > > > to ensure the free wed rx buffer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it is possiable that a large number of buffer has been
> > > > > > exchanged
> > > > > > to wed
> > > > > > and can not come back to wlan driver. So, the memory from the
> > > > > > same 32K
> > > > > > page cache is unable to be released, and it will be failed at
> > > > > > page_frag_alloc in mt76_dma_rx_fill.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any ideas but memcopy?
> > > > >
> > > > > A simple solution would be to simply allocate single pages, or
> > > > > half-page fragments.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Felix
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > A simple approach would be allocating a single page for each rx
> > > > buffer.
> > > >
> > > > @Sujuan: can you please double check if it is ok from performance
> > > > and
> > > > memory
> > > > fragmentation point of view? If not I guess we can try to
> > > > optimize it
> > > > and allocate multiple buffers in the same page tweeking page
> > > > refcount.
> > > >
> > > > (this patch must be applied on top of Felix's dma fix).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Allocating single page for each rx buffer avoids memory
> > > fragmentation,
> > > but it always uses 4K for one rx pkt which only needs 2K, right?
> >
> > correct, we can optimize it allocating multiple buffers (in this case
> > 2,
> > assuming 4K pages) in a single page and recycling the page.
> >
> > >
> > > I guess performance would be worse without page cache.
> >
> > I think it is a trade-off
> >
> > > We have tested on the mtk private driver, 7% drop in throughput
> > > when
> > > setting the 4K page cache compared to the 32K page cache.
> > > and 10% drop when use slab to allocate buffer.
> >
> > IIUC you tested with PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE set to 4K (or with a
> > private
> > page_frag_alloc() implementation) and you avoided memory allocation
> > failures due to fragmentation but you got ~ 7% drop in throughput,
> > correct?
> > I think this is quite expected since we need to refill ~ 8 times more
> > the
> > page cache.
> >
> > Not considering memory fragmentation, have you measured the impact of
> > the
> > memcpy of a full buffer?
> >
>
> well, for pure sw path, it maybe ~300M drop (not sure) when using
> memcpy(5G/HE80/4*4).
> but we do memcpy only when wed on, atfer a few unbinding pkts, then all
> flows are offloaded by hw. it is also a trade-off~
I guess we have quite a big impact if we enable wed and we do not actually
offload any flow (or we do not enable hw flowtable in netfilter), dont' we?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> Regards,
> Sujuan
>
> > >
> > > A single page per rx buffer may cause a throughput drop of over 7%
> > > and
> > > waste memory, what do you think?
> >
> > Implementing the page recycles as it is done in page_frag_alloc() we
> > should get
> > the same results you got with PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE set to 4K.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lorenzo
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sujuan
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Lorenzo
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> > > > index 28a7fe064313..1d9e580977fc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> > > > @@ -580,6 +580,20 @@ mt76_dma_tx_queue_skb(struct mt76_dev *dev,
> > > > struct mt76_queue *q,
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void *
> > > > +mt76_dma_get_rx_buf(struct mt76_queue *q)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if ((q->flags & MT_QFLAG_WED) &&
> > > > + FIELD_GET(MT_QFLAG_WED_TYPE, q->flags) == MT76_WED_Q_RX) {
> > > > + /* WED RX queue */
> > > > + struct page *page = dev_alloc_page();
> > > > +
> > > > + return page ? page_address(page) : NULL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return page_frag_alloc(&q->rx_page, q->buf_size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static int
> > > > mt76_dma_rx_fill(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -596,7 +610,7 @@ mt76_dma_rx_fill(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct
> > > > mt76_queue *q)
> > > > struct mt76_queue_buf qbuf;
> > > > void *buf = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > - buf = page_frag_alloc(&q->rx_page, q->buf_size,
> > > > GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > > + buf = mt76_dma_get_rx_buf(q);
> > > > if (!buf)
> > > > break;
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mmio.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mmio.c
> > > > index 1a2e4df8d1b5..2924e71e4fbe 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mmio.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mmio.c
> > > > @@ -594,13 +594,9 @@ static void
> > > > mt7915_mmio_wed_offload_disable(struct mtk_wed_device *wed)
> > > > static void mt7915_mmio_wed_release_rx_buf(struct mtk_wed_device
> > > > *wed)
> > > > {
> > > > struct mt7915_dev *dev;
> > > > - u32 length;
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > dev = container_of(wed, struct mt7915_dev, mt76.mmio.wed);
> > > > - length = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(NET_SKB_PAD + wed->wlan.rx_size +
> > > > - sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> > > > -
> > > > for (i = 0; i < dev->mt76.rx_token_size; i++) {
> > > > struct mt76_txwi_cache *t;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -610,7 +606,7 @@ static void
> > > > mt7915_mmio_wed_release_rx_buf(struct
> > > > mtk_wed_device *wed)
> > > >
> > > > dma_unmap_single(dev->mt76.dma_dev, t->dma_addr,
> > > > wed->wlan.rx_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > > > - __free_pages(virt_to_page(t->ptr), get_order(length));
> > > > + free_page(virt_to_page(t->ptr));
> > > > t->ptr = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > mt76_put_rxwi(&dev->mt76, t);
> > > > @@ -621,13 +617,9 @@ static u32
> > > > mt7915_mmio_wed_init_rx_buf(struct
> > > > mtk_wed_device *wed, int size)
> > > > {
> > > > struct mtk_rxbm_desc *desc = wed->rx_buf_ring.desc;
> > > > struct mt7915_dev *dev;
> > > > - u32 length;
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > dev = container_of(wed, struct mt7915_dev, mt76.mmio.wed);
> > > > - length = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(NET_SKB_PAD + wed->wlan.rx_size +
> > > > - sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> > > > -
> > > > for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> > > > struct mt76_txwi_cache *t = mt76_get_rxwi(&dev->mt76);
> > > > dma_addr_t phy_addr;
> > > > @@ -635,7 +627,7 @@ static u32 mt7915_mmio_wed_init_rx_buf(struct
> > > > mtk_wed_device *wed, int size)
> > > > int token;
> > > > void *ptr;
> > > >
> > > > - page = __dev_alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL,
> > > > get_order(length));
> > > > + page = __dev_alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > if (!page)
> > > > goto unmap;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -644,7 +636,7 @@ static u32 mt7915_mmio_wed_init_rx_buf(struct
> > > > mtk_wed_device *wed, int size)
> > > > wed->wlan.rx_size,
> > > > DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > > if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(dev->mt76.dev,
> > > > phy_addr))) {
> > > > - __free_pages(page, get_order(length));
> > > > + free_page(page);
> > > > goto unmap;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -653,7 +645,7 @@ static u32 mt7915_mmio_wed_init_rx_buf(struct
> > > > mtk_wed_device *wed, int size)
> > > > if (token < 0) {
> > > > dma_unmap_single(dev->mt76.dma_dev, phy_addr,
> > > > wed->wlan.rx_size,
> > > > DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > > - __free_pages(page, get_order(length));
> > > > + free_page(page);
> > > > goto unmap;
> > > > }
> > > >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/attachments/20221222/3ab7130e/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list