[PATCH v1 2/2] ufs: host: support wb toggle with clock scaling

[Peter Wang]

On 7/29/22 5:57 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 15:16 +0800, peter.wang at mediatek.com wrote:
>> From: Peter Wang <peter.wang at mediatek.com>
>>
>> Set UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING for qcom to compatible legacy
>> design.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang at mediatek.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-
>> qcom.c
>> index f10d4668814c..f8c9a78e7776 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static void ufs_qcom_set_caps(struct ufs_hba
>> *hba)
>>          struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
>>   
>>          hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_GATING |
>> UFSHCD_CAP_HIBERN8_WITH_CLK_GATING;
>> -       hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING;
>> +       hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING |
>> UFSHCD_CAP_WB_WITH_CLK_SCALING;
>>          hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_AUTO_BKOPS_SUSPEND;
>>          hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN;
>>          hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO;
> Hi peter,
>
> If WB is on/off based on clk scaling up/down is legacy design, maybe
> you have a more advanced design. It is true there is an issue since we
> didn't differentiate the read or write. WB is only for write. How to
> know this time clk scaling is for write from driver level, not possible
> now.
>
> Kind regards,
> Bean

Hi Bean,

Yes, we don't know if clock scaling up/down is for write or read.
But we want to keep WB always on even clock scaling down.
This is why we need this patch, let different host can choose toggle wb 
or not.

Thanks.
Peter