[PATCH v2 1/7] drm/bridge: ps8640: Use atomic variants of drm_bridge_funcs

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Sam,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 08:18:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> The atomic variants of enable/disable in drm_bridge_funcs are the
> preferred operations - introduce these.
> 
> The ps8640 driver used the non-atomic variants of the drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable/
> drm_bridge_chain_post_disable - convert these to the atomic variants.
> 
> v2:
>   - Added a few more people to cc: (Jitao, Enric, Philip) to increase
>     possibility to get test feedback
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime at cerno.tech>
> Cc: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi at mediatek.com>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
> Cc: Philip Chen <philipchen at chromium.org>
> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com>
> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>
> Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss at linaro.org>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Jonas Karlman <jonas at kwiboo.se>
> Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec at gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> index 3aaa90913bf8..0b620afe99c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,8 @@ static void ps8640_bridge_poweroff(struct ps8640 *ps_bridge)
>  	ps_bridge->powered = false;
>  }
>  
> -static void ps8640_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ps8640_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +				     struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ps8640 *ps_bridge = bridge_to_ps8640(bridge);
>  	int ret;
> @@ -388,7 +389,8 @@ static void ps8640_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  		ps8640_bridge_poweroff(ps_bridge);
>  }
>  
> -static void ps8640_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static void ps8640_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> +				       struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state)
>  {
>  	struct ps8640 *ps_bridge = bridge_to_ps8640(bridge);
>  
> @@ -489,7 +491,7 @@ static struct edid *ps8640_bridge_get_edid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	 * EDID, for this chip, we need to do a full poweron, otherwise it will
>  	 * fail.
>  	 */
> -	drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable(bridge);
> +	drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable(bridge, connector->state->state);
>  
>  	edid = drm_get_edid(connector,
>  			    ps_bridge->page[PAGE0_DP_CNTL]->adapter);
> @@ -499,7 +501,7 @@ static struct edid *ps8640_bridge_get_edid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>  	 * before, return the chip to its original power state.
>  	 */
>  	if (poweroff)
> -		drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(bridge);
> +		drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(bridge, connector->state->state);
>  
>  	return edid;
>  }
> @@ -508,8 +510,8 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ps8640_bridge_funcs = {
>  	.attach = ps8640_bridge_attach,
>  	.detach = ps8640_bridge_detach,
>  	.get_edid = ps8640_bridge_get_edid,
> -	.post_disable = ps8640_post_disable,
> -	.pre_enable = ps8640_pre_enable,
> +	.atomic_post_disable = ps8640_atomic_post_disable,
> +	.atomic_pre_enable = ps8640_atomic_pre_enable,

Don't you also need to implement .atomic_duplicate_state(),
.atomic_destroy_state() and .atomic_reset() to use the atomic API ?

>  };
>  
>  static int ps8640_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart