[PATCH 1/1] psi: stop relying on timer_pending for poll_work rescheduling
Suren Baghdasaryan
surenb at google.com
Mon Jun 21 10:49:51 PDT 2021
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 5:31 AM YT Chang <yt.chang at mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 14:26 -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Psi polling mechanism is trying to minimize the number of wakeups to
> > run psi_poll_work and is currently relying on timer_pending() to
> > detect
> > when this work is already scheduled. This provides a window of
> > opportunity
> > for psi_group_change to schedule an immediate psi_poll_work after
> > poll_timer_fn got called but before psi_poll_work could reschedule
> > itself.
> > Below is the depiction of this entire window:
> >
> > poll_timer_fn
> > wake_up_interruptible(&group->poll_wait);
> >
> > psi_poll_worker
> > wait_event_interruptible(group->poll_wait, ...)
> > psi_poll_work
> > psi_schedule_poll_work
> > if (timer_pending(&group->poll_timer)) return;
> > ...
> > mod_timer(&group->poll_timer, jiffies + delay);
> >
> > Prior to 461daba06bdc we used to rely on poll_scheduled atomic which
> > was
> > reset and set back inside psi_poll_work and therefore this race
> > window
> > was much smaller.
> > The larger window causes increased number of wakeups and our partners
> > report visible power regression of ~10mA after applying 461daba06bdc.
> > Bring back the poll_scheduled atomic and make this race window even
> > narrower by resetting poll_scheduled only when we reach polling
> > expiration
> > time. This does not completely eliminate the possibility of extra
> > wakeups
> > caused by a race with psi_group_change however it will limit it to
> > the
> > worst case scenario of one extra wakeup per every tracking window
> > (0.5s
> > in the worst case).
> > By tracing the number of immediate rescheduling attempts performed by
> > psi_group_change and the number of these attempts being blocked due
> > to
> > psi monitor being already active, we can assess the effects of this
> > change:
> >
> > Before the patch:
> > Run#1 Run#2 Run#3
> > Immediate reschedules
> > attempted: 684365 1385156 1261240
> > Immediate reschedules
> > blocked: 682846 1381654 1258682
> > Immediate reschedules (delta): 1519 3502 2558
> > Immediate reschedules (% of attempted): 0.22% 0.25% 0.20%
> >
> > After the patch:
> > Run#1 Run#2 Run#3
> > Immediate reschedules attempted: 882244 770298 426218
> > Immediate reschedules blocked: 881996 769796 426074
> > Immediate reschedules (delta): 248 502 144
> > Immediate reschedules (% of attempted): 0.03% 0.07% 0.03%
> >
> > The number of non-blocked immediate reschedules dropped from 0.22-
> > 0.25%
> > to 0.03-0.07%. The drop is attributed to the decrease in the race
> > window
> > size and the fact that we allow this race only when psi monitors
> > reach
> > polling window expiration time.
> >
>
>
> The regression power data points of Android phone in home screen idle:
> Original :baseline
> Original+ Patch : -21.5% (-11.5mA)
Ok, so this fixes the regression and then some (original regression
was +10mA and with the patch we've got -11.5mA). This must be the
contribution of the additional logic I added to avoid resetting
poll_scheduled when we know that the polling window is not yet over
(line with /* Polling window is not over, keep rescheduling */
comment).
> Tested-by: SH Chen <show-hong.chen at mediatek.com>
Thanks!
>
> > Fixes: 461daba06bdc ("psi: eliminate kthread_worker from psi trigger
> > scheduling mechanism")
> > Reported-by: Kathleen Chang <yt.chang at mediatek.com>
> > Reported-by: Wenju Xu <wenju.xu at mediatek.com>
> > Reported-by: Jonathan Chen <jonathan.jmchen at mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb at google.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/psi_types.h | 1 +
> > kernel/sched/psi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > --
> > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/psi_types.h b/include/linux/psi_types.h
> > index 0a23300d49af..ef8bd89d065e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/psi_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/psi_types.h
> > @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ struct psi_group {
> > struct timer_list poll_timer;
> > wait_queue_head_t poll_wait;
> > atomic_t poll_wakeup;
> > + atomic_t poll_scheduled;
> >
> > /* Protects data used by the monitor */
> > struct mutex trigger_lock;
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > index cc25a3cff41f..fed7c9c2b276 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static void group_init(struct psi_group *group)
> > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&group->avgs_work, psi_avgs_work);
> > mutex_init(&group->avgs_lock);
> > /* Init trigger-related members */
> > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0);
> > mutex_init(&group->trigger_lock);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->triggers);
> > memset(group->nr_triggers, 0, sizeof(group->nr_triggers));
> > @@ -551,18 +552,14 @@ static u64 update_triggers(struct psi_group
> > *group, u64 now)
> > return now + group->poll_min_period;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Schedule polling if it's not already scheduled. */
> > -static void psi_schedule_poll_work(struct psi_group *group, unsigned
> > long delay)
> > +/* Schedule polling if it's not already scheduled or forced. */
> > +static void psi_schedule_poll_work(struct psi_group *group, unsigned
> > long delay,
> > + bool force)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *task;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Do not reschedule if already scheduled.
> > - * Possible race with a timer scheduled after this check but
> > before
> > - * mod_timer below can be tolerated because group-
> > >polling_next_update
> > - * will keep updates on schedule.
> > - */
> > - if (timer_pending(&group->poll_timer))
> > + /* cmpxchg should be called even when !force to set
> > poll_scheduled */
> > + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&group->poll_scheduled, 0, 1) != 0 &&
> > !force)
> > return;
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > @@ -574,12 +571,15 @@ static void psi_schedule_poll_work(struct
> > psi_group *group, unsigned long delay)
> > */
> > if (likely(task))
> > mod_timer(&group->poll_timer, jiffies + delay);
> > + else
> > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0);
> >
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > }
> >
> > static void psi_poll_work(struct psi_group *group)
> > {
> > + bool force_reschedule = false;
> > u32 changed_states;
> > u64 now;
> >
> > @@ -587,6 +587,23 @@ static void psi_poll_work(struct psi_group
> > *group)
> >
> > now = sched_clock();
> >
> > + if (now > group->polling_until) {
> > + /*
> > + * We are either about to start or might stop polling
> > if no
> > + * state change was recorded. Resetting poll_scheduled
> > leaves
> > + * a small window for psi_group_change to sneak in and
> > schedule
> > + * an immegiate poll_work before we get to
> > rescheduling. One
> > + * potential extra wakeup at the end of the polling
> > window
> > + * should be negligible and polling_next_update still
> > keeps
> > + * updates correctly on schedule.
> > + */
> > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0);
> > + } else {
> > + /* Polling window is not over, keep rescheduling */
> > + force_reschedule = true;
> > + }
> > +
> > +
> > collect_percpu_times(group, PSI_POLL, &changed_states);
> >
> > if (changed_states & group->poll_states) {
> > @@ -612,7 +629,8 @@ static void psi_poll_work(struct psi_group
> > *group)
> > group->polling_next_update = update_triggers(group,
> > now);
> >
> > psi_schedule_poll_work(group,
> > - nsecs_to_jiffies(group->polling_next_update - now) +
> > 1);
> > + nsecs_to_jiffies(group->polling_next_update - now) + 1,
> > + force_reschedule);
> >
> > out:
> > mutex_unlock(&group->trigger_lock);
> > @@ -736,7 +754,7 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group
> > *group, int cpu,
> > write_seqcount_end(&groupc->seq);
> >
> > if (state_mask & group->poll_states)
> > - psi_schedule_poll_work(group, 1);
> > + psi_schedule_poll_work(group, 1, false);
> >
> > if (wake_clock && !delayed_work_pending(&group->avgs_work))
> > schedule_delayed_work(&group->avgs_work, PSI_FREQ);
> > @@ -1235,6 +1253,7 @@ static void psi_trigger_destroy(struct kref
> > *ref)
> > */
> > del_timer_sync(&group->poll_timer);
> > kthread_stop(task_to_destroy);
> > + atomic_set(&group->poll_scheduled, 0);
> > }
> > kfree(t);
> > }
More information about the Linux-mediatek
mailing list